When an autistic person has minimal speech, distress does not become less important. It may, however, become less recognisable through conventional forms of communication. In these situations, agitation, withdrawal, refusal, repetitive movement, vocal changes, or escalation may be treated as behaviours to manage, rather than as possible indicators of pain, sensory overload, fear, confusion, trauma, communicative frustration, or another unmet need.
The risk is not only misinterpretation, but also support that does not match the person’s needs. When distress is understood only at the surface level, the person may receive behaviour management when they may instead need pain recognition, reduced demands, more processing time, a calmer environment, visual support, AAC, or a different communicative response from the people around them. This can delay effective support and may intensify distress.
Behaviour, regulation, and communication
This does not mean that every intense or repetitive behaviour is a direct communicative act. Some behaviours may support self-regulation, sensory balance, concentration, or the release of intense emotion, including joy. Others may reflect discomfort, overload, or an attempt to show that something is wrong. Some may do both. The same outward behaviour may serve different functions for different people, and even for the same person across situations. Surface form What we see alone is not enough.
Interpretation therefore needs to begin with context. What was happening before the behaviour changed? What usually helps? What is typical for this person when they are calm, overwhelmed, unwell, in pain, or trying to avoid something? Without knowledge of the person’s baseline, familiar patterns, and likely stressors, subtle but important changes can easily be missed.
Pain may not look like pain
When a person cannot easily describe what hurts, pain may be expressed through changes in agitation, settling, movement, facial expression, withdrawal, or vocalisation. These changes may be visible, but they are not always recognised as pain. Instead, they may be interpreted as dysregulation, distress, or a behavioural difficulty. When this happens, support may be delayed and the underlying issue may remain untreated.
Distress can change communication
Communication during distress may also look different from communication when the person is calm. Some autistic people may speak less, rely more on non-spoken communication, withdraw, vocalise differently, or become less able to express pain, emotion, or need. In these moments, communication may become less clear, less direct, or less accessible to other people.
This matters because distress and communication difficulty may interact. Distress may reduce communicative capacity, while misunderstanding, repeated questioning, or communicative overload may further increase distress. What appears to be a behaviour problem may therefore reflect a communication problem, a distress problem, or both.
The communication partner is part of the interaction
Understanding distress depends not only on the autistic person’s communication, but also on how other people respond. Parents, carers, psychologists, teachers, allied health professionals, and medical staff are all part of the communicative context. Their responses may either reduce the burden or add to it. Breakdowns in understanding can arise within the interaction itself, especially when distress changes how a person communicatescommunicates, and those changes are not recognised, interpreted, or supported effectively.
Supportive responses may include calmer environments, fewer verbal demands, advance preparation, visual supports, AAC, clear choices, patience, and time to process. In contrast, rushed interpretation, repeated questioning, limited familiarity with the person’s communication style, or assumptions that behaviour is merely disruptive may increase communicative burden and make distress harder to resolve.
Effective responses to distress behaviour should beare:
- compassionate
- trauma-sensitive
- dignity-preserving
- attentive to assent and withdrawal of assent
- respectful of autonomy and preference
- responsive to the person’s communication profile
- grounded in context rather than assumption
This is particularly important when the person cannot add spoken clarification to what others are observing. In these moments, interpretation can become speculative unless it is grounded in context, relationship, and careful assessment.
Assessment beyond surface behaviour
For psychologists and other professionals, assessment cannot rely only on standardised tools, brief observation, or surface descriptions of behaviour. It also needs to consider the communication profile, sensory experience, medical context, likely stressors, familiar patterns of expression, and the knowledge held by people who know the person well.
Assessment needs to ask what may be happening for this person, in this setting, at this time, and what the behaviour may reflect, express, or help them manage. Without this, important needs may be missed and support may fail to match the person’s actual experience.
Our webcast, Masterclass Day 1: Assessment Beyond Diagnosis to Assist Autistic People with Minimal Speech, explores these issues in greater depth. It is designed to help parents and professionals move beyond surface interpretation and develop a more accurate understanding of distress, behaviour, and communication in context. This includes recognising when support needs, communication changes, pain, overload, or interactional factors may be missed, and how to assess these issues more carefully in practice.
References:
Dubois A, Michelon C, Rattaz C, Zabalia M, Baghdadli A. Daily living pain assessment in children with autism: Exploratory study. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;62:238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.01.003
Fitzpatrick R, McGuire BE, Lydon HK. Improving pain-related communication in children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2022;4(1):23-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12076
Ghaemmaghami, M., Ruppel, K., Cammilleri, A. P., Fiani, T., & Hanley, G. P. (2024). Toward Compassion in the Assessment and Treatment of Severe Problem Behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-01012-1
Hutchins TL, Prelock PA. Using communication to reduce challenging behaviors in individuals with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2014;23(1):41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2013.07.003
Kapp SK, Steward R, Crane L, Elliott D, Elphick C, Pellicano E, Russell G. ‘People should be allowed to do what they like’: Autistic adults’ views and experiences of stimming. Autism. 2019;23(7):1782-1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319829628
Keen D, Meadan H, Brady NC, Walle JW, eds. Prelinguistic and Minimally Verbal Communicators on the Autism Spectrum. Singapore: Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0713-2
Lund SK, Weissling K, Quach W, McKelvey M. Finding a voice for individuals with ASD who are minimally verbal through comprehensive communication assessment. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2021;6(2):306-314. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_PERSP-20-00227
Oldenburg K, Gibbons T, Welch C, Tint A, Albin M. Describing the communication of autistic people during experiences of distress: A scoping review. Autism. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613261417933
Palese A, Conforto L, Meloni F, Bordei V, Domenighini A, Bulfone E, Grassetti L, Gonella S. Assessing pain in children with autism spectrum disorders: Findings from a preliminary validation study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021;35(2):457-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12857
Sigafoos J, O’Reilly MF, Lancioni GE, Carnett A, Bravo A, Rojeski L, Halle JW. Functional assessment of problematic forms of prelinguistic behavior. In: Keen D, Meadan H, Brady NC, Walle JW, eds. Prelinguistic and Minimally Verbal Communicators on the Autism Spectrum. Singapore: Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0713-2_7
